RIO DE JANEIRO — Nearly two years after thousands of supporters of former President Jair Bolsonaro stormed Brazil’s National Congress, the presidential palace and the Supreme Court, the country is edging closer to directly linking the right-wing nationalist Bolsonaro to the Jan. 8, 2023, events.
The attack, strikingly similar to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack in the United States, caused about $3.5 million in damage — most of it at the court.
Bolsonaro, a vocal supporter of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, is already banned from running for office until 2030. Now, the attorney general's office must analyze police documents accusing him of taking part in planning a coup and decide whether to file charges with the Supreme Court.
Often described as far-right, Bolsonaro embraced conservative social values and a combative style mirroring Trump's tactics. He frequently questioned established institutions and voiced skepticism of electoral systems. During the Covid-19 pandemic, he downplayed the disease, opposed lockdowns, promoted unproven treatments, and ultimately refused vaccination.
In late November, the Federal Police released an investigation accusing 37 people, including Bolsonaro, of attempted coup and criminal conspiracy. On Dec. 14, the Federal Police arrested General Braga Netto — Bolsonaro’s former defense minister and vice-presidential candidate — on charges of interfering in the investigations.
Police say they uncovered a draft of a coup plan involving the assassination of key government figures, including then-President-elect Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. Investigators also concluded that Bolsonaro and his allies played a central role in the Jan. 8 acts of vandalism.
“At the time, viewed in isolation, the event didn’t appear to have the capacity to overthrow the government, so for many people, it came across less as a coup attempt and more as a clumsy effort to mimic the American case,” said Rodrigo Stumpf González, a political science professor at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. However, he believes it is now possible to view the episode as part of a broader sequence of events aimed at creating unrest to justify a coup.
The Joint Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry, which met from May through October 2023, came to similar conclusions. Bringing together 32 senators and 32 deputies to investigate the Jan. 8 episode, the commission wrote in its 1,755-page report that the attack “was not a spontaneous or disorganized movement. The idea was to make it possible to declare a state of siege, or impose another legal instrument that would produce similar effects.” In that document, 61 people were recommended for indictment, including Bolsonaro and 10 others named a year later by the Federal Police.
González traces the start of the supposed coup plot to July 18, 2022, when Bolsonaro hosted ambassadors from different countries and openly questioned the security of electronic voting machines, making unfounded criticisms of the Brazilian electoral system.
The next stage, González said, was the establishment of pro-Bolsonaro camps in front of military barracks nationwide following Lula’s election on Oct. 30, 2022. In Brasília, supporters gathered outside the army headquarters.
Military intervention
For political science professor Mayra Goulart, from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, the role of the military distinguished Brazil’s crisis from that in the United States.
“Since the Paraguayan War, Brazil has maintained a tradition of military protagonism in domestic politics,” she said.
The Paraguayan War of 1864-70 saw a fight over territory between Paraguay and the alliance of the then-Empire of Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay. The alliance won, giving the Brazilian army a confidence boost and contributing to a moment some historians see as more of a military coup that kicked off the Brazilian Republic.
Goulart added that the military formed the basis of Bolsonaro’s electoral rise and had financial interests in his leadership. She believes this deeper involvement justified the more forceful response by Brazilian institutions compared to the U.S.





