WASHINGTON — Three current and former homeless individuals challenging Washington’s protocol for clearing encampments throughout the city lack standing to raise their Fourth or Fifth Amendment claims, a federal court ruled. Their “Achilles heel,” the court ruled, is that the protocol never injured the plaintiffs.
Subscribe to our free newsletters
Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.
