Online therapy
WASHINGTON — In a case challenging the District of Columbia’s rules about online therapy, a federal court ruled a Virginia-based counselor’s First Amendment and overbreadth claims may proceed. The disputed licensing requirement, which prohibits the therapist from serving D.C.-based clients, is a “content-based regulation of speech” and the plaintiff adequately alleged it “does not survive strict scrutiny.”
Subscribe to our free newsletters
Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing
trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the
monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech
and the arts.