LAS VEGAS — A federal court in Nevada sided with a county, sued by a tiger-owning couple over the county’s allegedly unconstitutional conditions on exotic animal permits, finding there “is no constitutional right to the unregulated ownership of exotic animals,” so the conditions on the family’s permits did not violate their rights, nor do they constitute a taking.
Read the ruling here.
Our weekly newsletter Closing Arguments offers the latest about ongoing trials, major litigation and rulings in courthouses around the U.S. and the world, while the monthly Under the Lights dishes the legal dirt from Hollywood, sports, Big Tech and the arts.
